A layman’s guide to cell phone Gs

Following the TFP Guide, I had a request to create a guide explaining what the Gs meant when describing cell phone technology and progress, such as 2G or 3G.

The easiest way to describe what a G refers to is “The generation (G) from which a mobile communication standard belongs, indicating its maturity and technological advancement.”

Or more basically: “How new and good it is.”

The first generation of mobile telephony (1G) was entirely analog, with the exception of the signals to initiate calls. The phone calls themselves were completely analog, and offered very little security or protection against unauthorized usage or call snooping. Of course, text messaging and web surfing were not possible at all on these devices.

1G technologies: Nordic Mobile Telephone (NMT), Advanced Mobile Phone System (AMPS)

First generation networks have now been phased out almost completely, and replaced by two major types of second generation (2G) networks: GSM and CDMA. The use of GSM was mandated in Europe, which combined with interchangeable SIM cards containing a user’s account and phone number allowed for heavy competition in the marketplace. In North America, providers had to chose between the compatibility and popularity of GSM, or the more secure, efficient CDMA technologies. This gap made competition much harder in these markets.

2G technologies were all-digital, and were the first to allow text messaging and web access over the network. various enhancements and add-ons were made to these networks to allow greater data speeds and efficiency. These enhancements are often referred to as “2.5G” or “2.75G”

GSM and CDMA are still popular technologies around the world. However their security, efficiency and data speeds are becoming eclipsed by the newer 3G technologies.

2G technologies: Global System for Mobile Telecomunications (GSM), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA)

Add-ons: General Pack Radio Service (GPRS – GSM data add-on), Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution (EDGE – GSM faster data), 1xRTT (CDMA – faster CDMA data and better efficiency)

3G is the fastest and most modern generation of technologies in mass use today. Instead of being voice-centric with data add-ons, 3G networks were designed for high speed web access and internet protocol (IP) connectivity.

Although the CDMA family of technologies had a 3G spec in the form of Evolution – Data Optimized (EVDO), it was only an add-on to the older 1x-RTT technology, and didn’t allow simultaneous voice and data, exchangeable SIM cards or speeds above 3Mbps.

The key 3G technology in use today is called Universal Mobile Telephony System (UMTS) which is based on an improved version of CDMA technology, but is actually part of the GSM family of technologies. Unlike EVDO, which is a 3G add-on to the older 1xRTT spec, UMTS is a whole new network spec, radically different from the older GSM specs. Despite being able to switch between GSM and UMTS networks, the two are not backwards compatible, making UMTS networks require new equipment, additional radio spectrum, and new devices to use the network. This makes upgrading from GSM to UMTS expensive and difficult.

Basic UMTS networks provide data speeds comprable to that of 2G networks, but allowed voice calls and data to be used at the same time. Also, with the High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) and High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) add-ons, together known as High Speed Packet Access (HSPA, a “3.5G” technology), download speeds could be increased to 1.8, then 3,6, then 7.2Mbps.

HSPA+ (a “3.75G” technology) increases the efficiency and speed of UMTS networks to 21Mbps and beyond. Deployment of EVDO networks stopped with EVDO Rev A, which delivered speeds of 3.1Mbps.

3G technologies: Code Division Multiple Access – Evolution Data Optimized (CDMA – EVDO), Universal Mobile Telephony System (UMTS)

Add-ons: EVDO Rev A (Faster EVDO data speeds), High Speed Packet Access (Faster UMTS data speeds)

Fourth generation networks are currently under development and testing, and although a rival technology called Ultra Mobile Broadband (UMB) was proposed, almost every carrier in the world has agreed on using a technology called Long Term Evolution (LTE), which will start being used publicly in the following months. 4G networks are designed to not only allow fast data speeds, but also low latency and VoIP for voice calls. All communication will be routed as data over the IP network.

WiMax is already in use in some areas as a high speed “4G” network technology, but some may argue against this classification, as WiMax is not used, nor was it designed for voice or messaging purposes. WiMax has not gained major popularity, and its niche in the market is waning as HSPA+ increases data speeds above what WiMax is realistically capable of achieving, as well as having backwards compatibility with 3G devices, voice and messaging services, higher worldwide adoption and superior coverage. Also, with LTE soon to be entering the market with far superior speeds and latency, and the support of all major service providers, WiMax may soon be obsolete, leaving LTE as the only 4G network technology achieving mass adoption. CDMA, GSM and UMTS networks will be capable of handing off to LTE.

4G technologies: Long Term Evolution (LTE), Ultra Mobile Broadband (UMB), WiMax

That concludes the first edition of my guide to Gs. If you have any questions, comments or corrections, please feel free to leave a comment below.

Posted in Phone articles Tagged , , , ,

Listening to this week: My Bloody Valentine – Loveless (1991)

Loveless

Loveless

A cult classic, Loveless was released in 1991 to much critical acclaim. Of course, because it was good, no one bought the album and My Bloody Valentine is now better known as a crappy Canadian horror B-movie.

Shrouds of mystery and urban legend surround the production of Loveless. Rumours of the recording costing £250,000, changing engineers until they gave up, or turning record executive’s hair grey from stress.

No matter what the stories say, or how few people bought Loveless, it is an astounding album that really has no comparison or similarities. The dreamy feel of the guitars mixed with the vocals buried deep in the mix and catchy synth riffs is sublime, but only if you can break past the unique production and non-conventional feel of the album.

Loveless is undoubtedly a very worthy listen, especially for those who are interested in the post-rock and post-metal genres, as well as art rock and instrumental rock fans. Loveless paved the way for a whole new genre of music which is still affecting the music world nearly 20 years later, and inspired countless numbers of bands, from Explosions in the Sky to Isis. This alone should be reason to recommend Loveless, but My Bloody Valentine gave me enough reasons to recommend their last full-length release anyway.

Best songs: Only Shallow, When You Sleep, Blown a Wish, Soon

Low points: Touched

Conclusion: A must listen. Both influential and resonating, with catchiness to boot.

Find it on Amazon

Posted in Album reviews Tagged , , ,

Thoughts on S60

Nokia E71

Nokia E71

I recently came into possession of my very first smartphone, a Nokia E71. An aging device, I know, and a late entrance to the smartphone world indeed, but as a QWERTY device, with a smartphone OS and 3G compatibility on my provider’s network, it was a good choice for the low price I paid.

Now, I’m into the world of S60, a smartphone OS that the masses call “versatile, but dated” and is criticized for lacking polish and a degree of user-friendliness. I’ve been using S60 for long enough now to have a pretty good understanding of the platform’s shortcomings, and advantages over the competition, plus have a degree of insight over how I think Nokia should develop and refine the world’s most popular smartphone software as it comes under new competition from the likes of BlackBerry OS, Android, iPhone, Windows Mobile and even Nokia’s newer Meego platform.

What’s good

Customization
S60 has a ton of customization options, from themes to ringtones and whatever else. Although I’m not a skinner myself (the included skins are always better than the ones made by users) having this feature available is a nice option.

Application Choice
By being an open, mature platform without Steve Jobs saying what can and cannot be allowed on his phone, the development community on Symbian is large and has contributed hundreds upon hundreds of programs, both free and paid. The downside of such a large, unregulated development community, though, is that the quality of many of the apps is subpar, and could use polish.

PIM Features
S60 (on my business-orientated E71, at least) comes with a suite of tools which very effectively organize dates, people and emails, with Nokia’s push email Messaging program. All contacts and calendar dates sync flawlessly with their respective apps on my Mac via iSync, and are easy to navigate, organize and modify.

Speed
Even with a now dinky 370MHz processor, the E71 never seems to lag, even with several programs running. Navigating menus, running programs and sending messages, all without any slowdown or hiccups.

App Switching
With a quick hold of the Home key brings up a task manager. Move up and down to switch to whatever app you want. Press the button quickly to return to the home screen. Applications can also run on top of others, so press the calendar button once to check your schedule, then press it once again to return to the app you were running before.

What’s bad

Threaded SMS
Although a “want” more than a “must” before the iPhone rolled into the pockets of millions, Nokia still have an obligation to its user base to stop S60 from being the only smartphone platform without threaded messaging. Although their Conversation app beta was an acceptable start, it had flaws (several) and hasn’t been updated since 2008. The best solution on S60 is the appropriately named Free-iSMS, but this too has flaws. It has to be signed through a cryptic and confusing process, crashes often and conflicts with the system’s security features. Texting on S60 leaves a lot to be desired.

3G / Wifi selection
Wifi is one of the features that separates a high-end smartphone from the entry-level. Living in a country that charges $25 for half a gigabyte of data, I find wifi to be a handy feature. S60, though, doesn’t decide to route all data between wifi (when enabled) and 3G (when wifi isn’t). Instead, applications decide on a case by case basis what connection to use, and some applications don’t even let you decide. The ones that do, list your WAP connection, your internet APN and your MMS (?) every single time you go online. Not smooth, Nokia. Not smooth.

Ovi Store
Centralized app stores are the new trend, but Nokia’s is fine while browsed on a computer, but on the device itself, it’s slow and laggy, possibly the slowest app on the phone. Personally, quality control on the store needs to be improved slightly as well.

Autocorrect Behaviour
S60 treats autocorrect like T9; grouping words as a whole instead of just correcting mistakes. Although the correction on my E71 is excellent, I have little to no control over the dictionary, capitalization, or rules of the predictive text. Sometimes rules are kept, sometimes they’re not. And if I want to change one letter of a word, such as changing “firing” to “wiring”, I have to delete and retype every letter of the word, since S60 only lets you select words, not individual letters.

Where this leaves Nokia

As the smartphone market pushes closer and closer to having touchscreen devices exclusively, the choices for standard QWERTY operating systems is shrinking to  just RIM’s proprietary BlackBerry OS and the (now open source) Symbian OS. Windows Mobile 6 has fallen out of favour and is being replaced with a new touch-centric Windows Mobile 7, eliminating that choice from the marketplace.

There is certainly a niche in the market for smartphones without touchscreens, as the success of RIM shows. However, like many other phone manufacturers, Nokia failed to not only see the arrival of the iPhone coming, but also failed to react effectively to it, instead acting complacent and creating devices that certainly topped the Apple device’s features and customizability, but fell far short in usability in comparison. While Apple remedied most of the issues with their product, Nokia’s momentum came to a halt, and when they finally responded with a touchscreen smartphone, it used a cobbled-together, touch version of the dated S60 OS, frustrating resistive touchscreen and fell victim to many of the criticisms I listed above.

It was only with the release of the N900 device, which used Linux-based Maemo as its OS in place of S60, that Nokia began to “get it”. Sure, the N900 still had resistive touch, and yes the OS was still slightly short of the primetime, but all the pieces were in place. Maemo (now merged with Intel’s Moblin to become the MeeGo OS) was a modern, powerful Linux OS, with the usual Nokia emphasis on development and media. The N900′s specs were jawdropping, with the typical N-Series camera magnificence and 32GB of internal memory. The N900 was not the device to beat the iPhone or Android devices, but it showed that Nokia were able to adapt to the flow of the market, albeit slowly.

What needs to be done

Since being open sourced, Symbian development has been ramped up, and the new Nokia N8 has been announced, running the new Symbian^3 operating system. Nokia and the Symbian Foundation should instead be focusing on their strengths in low and mid end devices, especially ones lacking touch screens, leaving the high end touchscreen smartphone market to Android and MeeGo. By having two flagship smartphone operating systems, Nokia runs a very high risk of not only fragmenting its product line, as it has for far too long, but also competing with itself and driving away developers and customers.

By moving S60 into the market that S40 fills now, Nokia can stop the trend among their competitors that is eroding Nokia’s once dominant position in the featurephone market. Samsung, LG, and other companies are now making sub-$100 phones with full keyboards, simple multitasking and threaded messaging, which not even S60 has at this point (though will be added in later revisions).

By consolidating their product lineup, keeping MeeGo for the high end, where it can run and be competitive on both high end phones and netbooks (classes of devices that seem to be closer and closer to combining every day) and pushing Symbian down to the mid-ranged market, Nokia can not only have a strong smartphone OS for the future, but also be able to push a stable and mature OS platform onto devices and into the hands of customers that had never had a chance (or the desire) to own a smarthphone before. This would end the trend of other companies filling the space that used to be comfortably occupied by the Finnish giant. Luckily, Nokia seem to be taking at least some of this to heart…

In short

  • Consolidate product lines, as Nokia has started to a degree: no more 4 number codes and competing products
  • Drop Symbian as a flagship OS; use MeeGo instead
  • Fix the major flaws and add considerable polish to Symbian to make it ready for low-end consumers
  • Make agreements with all service providers to provide products at all cost levels, not just the low-end
  • Respond quicker to market trends and competitor products; make roadmap adjustments as needed

Posted in Opinions, Phone articles Tagged , , , , ,

How to tell if a phone will work with any wireless carrier

This is my technique for determining if any device will work with any network. Here it is:

T F P

Technology
Frequency
Permission

What does this mean? Read on.

Technology refers to the network technology used. GSM, UMTS, IDEN or CDMA, most likely. Look at the technology type(s) for your device, and then at the network you want to use. If they match, continue. If they don’t, stop, do not pass go, do not collect $200. Look for a new device or a new network.

Some devices, typically UMTS ones, support both GSM and UMTS networks. So long as there is at least one network that both phone and network support, the phone should work on the network. Only running on one technology may reduce internet speeds, services or coverage, though.

If the phone matches the frequency of the network, you can move on to the next criteria: frequency.

Frequency is the operating frequency that a phone operates on. Unlike an FM radio, the frequency of a phone cannot be changed, but there are usually several bands that a phone supports – from 2 to 5, typically. Even if a phone uses the same network technology as a network, unless they run on the same frequency, the phone won’t be able to connect to the network.

Please note that many networks work on 2 frequencies, typically a high and a low one. If a phone can use one of the frequencies and not the other, you may get some service, but coverage and/or signal strength may be reduced.

If a phone runs on the same technology and frequency as a carrier’s network, there’s no scientific reason why the device shouldn’t work. But politics always plays a role, so next to check is permission.

Permission is the test of whether a phone will be allowed on the network, or the use of a network on a phone is allowed. Both the phone and the network have to give permission for the device to be used.

Some, but a minority of networks will only allow their own branded devices to be used on their wireless networks. The older CDMA networks of Telus and Bell operated in this manner: a phone could only be activated on the service for which the device is branded, and the network would only activate devices sold by the carrier. With newer, SIM-based networks (including the Telus/Bell UMTS network), this is not usually the case, and a SIM card can be activated for use on any compatible device.

The more common permission issue is that of SIM-locking. This is where a phone can only be used with a SIM card of the provider the phone was bought from. For example, a phone bought from AT&T will not accept a SIM from T-Mobile, as all SIMs except AT&T SIMs are blocked. Phones can be unlocked to accept other SIMs, either by asking the original service provider (some have policies for/against this), using an unlocking service found online or in a mall, or using tools such an iSmartSIM (Google it).

If a phone can accept a SIM from the provider you want service from, and the service provider is willing to offer a SIM, or otherwise allow your phone on the network, you have permission, and the phone will work on the network. Well done!!

How to use TFP

TFP is easy to use once you understand it. Let’s run through the practical applications of TFP.

I want to buy a new phone. The first thing to check is the technology of the phone against the technology used by the carrier I want to use. In this case, I want to use Wind Mobile Canada. The device I want is a MyTouch 3G.

Wind’s network uses the UMTS technology, sometimes known as HSPA or WCDMA (NOT the same as CDMA, 1x, or EV-DO). The MyTouch also uses UMTS, and has GSM as well. Wind’s roaming in Canada and abroad uses GSM, so I’ll get coverage at home, and when travelling. The phone at the network share the same technology, and I can pass onto the frequency stage. Here are some other examples of checking technology:

Passing Example
Phone name: LG Rumour
Phone technology: CDMA
Network name: Bell Mobility (old network)
Network technology: CDMA
Result: PASS – move on to Frequency

Failing Example
Phone name: Nokia 6301
Phone technology: GSM
Network name: Bell Mobility (old network)
Network technology: CDMA
Result: FAIL – try a different device, or network

After knowing my device uses the right technology, I need to check the frequency.

As a quick aside, it’s good to note that there may be several versions of the same device, which use different frequencies or technologies based on the location in which they were designed for. For example, the HTC Hero comes in 3 versions: A CDMA version for Sprint in the USA, an 850 / 1900 MHz UMTS version for use in Canada by Telus and a 900 / 2100MHz UMTS model for use in Europe. Check the technology / frequency of the device you are buying or have bought!

After finding out what version of the phone I want (the T-Mobile MyTouch 3G, not the HTC Magic from Rogers or from Europe), I check the frequencies: 1700 MHz and 2100 MHz. Wind’s network uses 1700 MHz, so the MyTouch is compatible with the technology Wind uses, on the same frequency. Almost there!

Also, Just like with network technology, some frequencies can have different names. For example, 1700 MHz can be written as 1.7 GHz, AWS, UMTS band IV, etc. If unsure, use Google for an explanation. It is important to ensure that you are checking the frequency of each network technology, as each radio technology may operate on different frequencies within a phone (confusingly enough!). For example, a European Nokia E71 uses GSM on Quad-band frequencies (850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz) but UMTS on only 900 / 2100 MHz, so if I use this device on Rogers Wireless, which has GSM on 850 and 1900 MHz, but UMTS on 850 and 1900 MHz as well, I can only use this phone on GSM, since the European E71 only supports UMTS on frequencies that Rogers do not.

Here are a couple of extra examples of frequency compatibility:

Passing Example
Phone name: iPhone 3G
Phone technology: GSM and UMTS
Phone frequency: 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz on GSM, 850 / 1900 / 2100 MHz on UMTS
Network name: Rogers Wireless
Network technology: GSM and UMTS
Network frequency: 850 / 1900 MHz on GSM, 850 / 1900 MHz on UMTS
Result: PASS – works on both, check Permission

Failing Example
Phone name: iPhone 3G
Phone technology: GSM and UMTS
Phone frequency: 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz on GSM, 850 / 1900 / 2100 MHz on UMTS
Network name: Wind Mobile (Canada)
Network technology: UMTS
Network frequency: 1700 MHz on UMTS
Result: FAIL – phone does not run on carrier’s frequency

After technology and frequency comes permission. Permission is the hardest criteria to judge and has the most variables, but also the only one that can be fixed if there is a problem. As a rule of thumb for devices, especially in North America, is that if the device has a carrier’s branding on the device’s hardware (such a brand logo), then it is SIM-locked, and must be unlocked. If buying a device used, ask the seller if the device is unlocked, although unless advertised, it probably isn’t.

If the device is locked, look at the price of getting it unlocked, if possible. If it is easy and economical to do so, then getting the phone unlocked will let it work with your network, providing you have a SIM card. In my case, I can unlock a MyTouch 3G easily, and Wind provide SIM cards for $10, so I have permission.

Here are a couple of other examples:

Passing Example
Phone name: iPhone 3G
Phone technology: GSM and UMTS
Phone frequency: 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz on GSM, 850 / 1900 / 2100 MHz on UMTS
Network name: Rogers Wireless
Network technology: GSM and UMTS
Network frequency: 850 / 1900 MHz on GSM, 850 / 1900 MHz on UMTS
Phone can use Rogers SIM: Yes, phone is unlocked
Phone permitted on Rogers network: Yes, SIM card available
Result: PASS – this phone will work flawlessly on Rogers

Failing Example
Phone name: LG Xenon
Phone technology: GSM and UMTS
Phone frequency: 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz on GSM, 850 / 1900 MHz on UMTS
Network name: Rogers Wireless
Network technology: GSM and UMTS
Network frequency: 850 / 1900 MHz on GSM, 850 / 1900 MHz on UMTS
Phone can use Rogers SIM: No, phone is SIM locked to Bell
Phone permitted on Rogers network: Yes, SIM card available
Result: FAIL – must be unlocked before being used with a Rogers SIM

Failing Example
Phone name: BlackBerry Curve 8330 (Bell)
Phone technology: CDMA
Phone frequency: 800 / 1900 MHz
Network name: Telus Mobility (old network)
Network technology: CDMA
Network frequency: 800 / 1900 MHz
Phone can use Telus SIM: CDMA phone, no SIM
Phone permitted on Telus network: Phone is Bell branded, may not be used on Telus
Result: FAIL – Only Telus devices may be used on Telus CDMA network

So my MyTouch 3G will work with my Wind service plan, as proven by TFP. This guide may seem a bit long, so here’s a cheat sheet you can reference easily:

Easy TFP Guide

1) Discover the network technology of both the device and the network. If at least one matches, continue.
2) Find out the frequencies at which both the network and the phone run on. If at least one matches, continue.
3) Make sure the carrier allows non-branded devices on the network.
4) Find out if the phone is SIM unlocked, or if SIM unlocking is possible.

If all 4 come out positive, you’re good to go.

Thus concludes my brief guide on how to determine if a phone will work on a corresponding network. Feel free to ask questions or point out issues or concerns with the guide.

Posted in Phone articles Tagged , , ,

Of Scapegoats and Evolution

When someone blurts out incomprehensible crap, most of us will simply gloss past it. Ignore it. Laugh at it. Ridicule it.

Very rarely do we actually stop and ask why.

Not why do we laugh, but why do these people come out with such laughable statements. Statements such as Ron Jeremy’s recent admittance that he hates the internet. It’s not a shocking statement from him. Shortly before, porn’s favourite actor went out of his way to alienate fans and infuriate a segment of the population by calling violent video games a bigger negative influence on kids than porn. While a statement such as the one above cannot be completely shot down (I certainly wouldn’t want any child of mine witnessing either until an appropriate age) it shows a degree of ignorance far too common among those whom the media give airtime.

And it is always the same garbage that comes out of these mouths; statements about violence in gaming and lost record sales. While the numbers and the research so blatantly tell the truth (and that truth is easy to find), the public laps up whatever fear and blame they can lay their hands on. So when Ron Jeremy points fingers elsewhere to cover up the evils of his own trade (not the sex itself, but the promotion of promiscuity and the worrying lack of protection), he is instead fuelling a fire that is already attacking the modern media and that he has become a part of. We know at this stage that much of the public will happily rest on a scapegoat they can chase with pitchforks, and those that don’t are simply too apathetic to do anything at all.

Mr. Jeremy’s statements about gaming were simply a precursor to the not-so-surprising things he came out with later at CES: that he simply doesn’t like the internet. He claims it has stolen his identity and is taking his money and is taking his movies for free. He may very well be right about that. But while dinosaurs died when their world changed, humans didn’t. As creatures of adaption, we take pride in our abilities to morph, evolve and suit the world that we live in, even if the ball is no longer in our court. People stopped buying CDs and the old men in suits died of shock and hatred towards this new invention that took the floor out from under their feet. The musicians started donations, pre-sales and pay what you like. The young adapted; the old died out.

The final point highlighted in Maggie Shiels’ article is that of equally disconcerting measure. Both Mr. Jeremy, with his BAs and masters degrees, and Nicholas Carr from various high-brow publications state that the internet, with its endless arrays of information and easy access to on-demand knowledge, is sucking the intelligence from our children and making them useless at memorizing anything and impeding their formation of their own opinions, as if the current traditional media hasn’t been doing that already. While personal experience finds these gentlemen’s claims to be untrue, the concept they are speaking of certainly wouldn’t be a tragedy. For too long have schools been dependant of blind memorization of numbers and letters. On a student’s transition to college, the idea of subjective writing hits them in the face like a brick wall. Intelligence has for too long been defined as a game of memorization and not of subjective thought, problem solving and creativity, leading young adults into the real world without the sufficient skills and mentality for a workplace environment.

That’s the message that’s remained consistant since video gaming, the internet and social media entered the mainstream. Those who fail to adapt, the ones who expect a computer to just be another typewriter or another TV are the ones who not only miss out on all the benefits of this new world, but are ultimately left behind by it. Only those afraid of change and the power of this new technology are trying to stop it. The Facebook generation, which has embraced the programmable computer as the most powerful and versatile device ever created by mankind, is forging the path we’re taking into the coming years and to ignore it is to be left out completely.

Posted in Essays Tagged , , , , , ,